Figures and protocols

Cover page illustration by Karin Rengefors

Long curved sterigmata

Fig. 1. Schematic illustrations of some morphological characters.

Fig. 2. A schematic picture of a decapitated fruit body with regenerated tissue on top of the stem.

Fig. 3.Schematic picture of ectomycorrhiza between Picea abies and C. cibarius.

Fig. 4. Schematic figure of the Culture unit system (CUS).

Fig. 5. Schematic protocol for mycorrhiza synthesis and transfer to green house.

Fig. 6A.Photograph of the culture unit system (CUS).

Fig. 6B.C. cibarius mycorrhiza with Picea abies.

Fig. 6C. Section of a mycorrhizal short root (C. cibarius and P. abies).

Fig. 7. Schematic protocol for PCR and RFLP analysis.

Fig.8.Gel electrophoresis of amplified ITS of different C. cibarius/C. pallens strains.

Fig.9.Gel electrophoresis of amplified ITS of different basidiomycetes.

Photograph of gels (Figs 8 & 9), not originaly included in the thesis..

Fig. 10.RFLP analysis of the amplified ITS from C. cibarius and C. pallens, fruit bodies and axenic mycelia (no difference between strains).

Photograph of gel (Fig 10), not originally included in the thesis .

Fig. 11. RFLP analysis of the amplified ITS from C. cibarius mycorrhizae.

Fig.12a A bacterium prepared for division with enlarged chromosome.

Fig.12b Two bacteria embedded in polysaccharides (mucus).

Fig.13 TEM photograph of a mycorrhizal mantle with inoculated Pseudomonas fluorescens colonizing the surface.

Fig.14. A map showing findings (1972-1993) of C. cibarius reported to the Swedish Mycological Society.

The AHN method.

Protocol for DNA extraction and PCR.

Protocol for RFLP.

---

This page (http://www.mykopat.slu.se/mycorrhiza/kantarellfiler/texter/figs.htm) was updated by:
Eric Danell (Eric.Danell@mykopat.slu.se),
Department of Forest Mycology and Pathology,
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Updated: November 20, 2002